Raj Ramniklal Desai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune And Anr
High Court
23 Sep 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Raj Ramniklal Desai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune And Anr
Date of order
23 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Raj Ramniklal Desai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune And Anr, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2)In view of the above, liberty as prayed for is granted.3)Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.638 OF 2014
Raj Ramniklal Desai.
..Petitioner.
vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune and anr...Respondents.
Ms. Natasha Mangat i/by S.C. Tiwari for the Petitioner.Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Sham Walve for the Respondents.
CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA AND N.M.JAMDAR, JJ.DATE : 23 SEPTEMBER 2014
PC:
Ms. Mangat, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. This petition challenges an order dated 25 March 2013 issued under Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961(“the Act.) relating to Assessment Years 2009-10 and 2010-11. Ms. Mangat informs us that by communication dated 19 September 2014 the respondent-revenue vacated the order dated 25 March 2013 issued under Section 179 of the Act for Assessment Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011.
2)In view of the above, liberty as prayed for is granted.3)Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( N. M. JAMDAR, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue