Case LawHigh Court › Rajamanickam Arulselvan v. Income Tax Of...

Rajamanickam Arulselvan v. Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward, 13(4), Chennai... R1 In Wp

High Court 31 Oct 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Rajamanickam Arulselvan v. Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward, 13(4), Chennai... R1 In Wp
Date of order
31 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rajamanickam Arulselvan v. Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward, 13(4), Chennai... R1 In Wp, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P.No. 35381, 928 & 934 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 31.10.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.Nos.35381, 928 & 934 of 2019 & WMP.Nos.36206, 36208, 26209 & 1045 of 2019 Rajamanickam Gautaman ... Petitioner in WP.No.35381 of 2019 Rajamanickam Arulselvan ... Petitioner in WP.Nos.928 & 934 of 2019 Vs. 1.Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward, 13(4), Chennai... R1 in WP.No.35381 of 2019 2.Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 10 121 Mahathma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam Chennai. ... R2 in WP.No.35381 of 2019 3.Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward 1(1) Room 412, 4[th] Floor, Tower-1, BSNL Building, 16 Greams Road, Chennai-06 ... R1 in WP.Nos.928 & 934 of 2019 4.Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation Ward 1(1) Room 412, 4[th] Floor, Tower-1, BSNL Building, 16 Greams Road, Chennai-06 ...R2 in WP.Nos.928 & 934 of 2019 W.P.No. 35381, 928 & 934 of 2019 Prayer in WP.No.35381 of 2019:Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue aWrit of certiorari calling for the records on the file of the first respondent and quash the impugned order in PAN: bearing No.ITBA/AST/F/17/2019-20/1022252177(1) dated 13.12.2019 along with the notice dated 29.03.2019, bearing No.ITBA/AST/S/148/2018-19/1015531342(1) issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2013-14. Prayer in WP.No.928 of 2019:Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue aWrit of certiorari calling for the records on the file of the first respondent and quash the impugned order in PAN: dated 31.12.2018 passed under Section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2013-14. Prayer in WP.No.928 of 2019:Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue aWrit of certiorari calling for the records on the file of the first respondent and quash the impugned order in F.No.ITO/INt.Tax.1(1)/APPA2346C/2018-19 dated 24.12.2018 along with notice PAN: dated 28.03.2018 in notice number ITBA/AST/S/148/1009500301(1) issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2013-14. In all WPsFor Petitioners : Mr.N.V.BalajiFor Respondents: Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arun Kumar Junior Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw W.P.Nos.928 & 35381 of 2019. He has also made an endorsement to this effect. In WP.No.928 of 2019, the petitioner seeks liberty to challenge order of assessment dated 31.12.2018 leaving all grounds open for adjudication. W.P.No. 35381, 928 & 934 of 2019 2. In light of endorsement made, WP.No.928 of 2019 is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appeal. Appeal, if filed within a period of four weeks from today, will be entertained by the appellate authority without reference to limitation but subject to all other statutory compliances required, if any. 3. As far as WP.No.934 of 2019 is concerned, it has become infructuous since it challenges a speaking order disposing the objections filed by the assessee challenging the assumption of jurisdiction, which order stands telescoped in the order of assessment assailed in WP.No.928 of 2019. WP.No.934 of 2019 is thus dismissed as infructuous. 4. In light of endorsement made, WP.No.35381 of 2019 is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to both parties to comply with the procedure for re-assessment as set out by the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Vs. Income Tax Officer [259 ITR 18]. This exercise shall be completed within a period of 12 weeks from date of receipt a copy of this order. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 31.10.2022 skaIndex : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non speaking Order To DR.ANITA SUMANTH,J.ska 4. In light of endorsement made, WP.No.35381 of 2019 is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to both parties to comply with the procedure for re-assessment as set out by the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Vs. Income Tax Officer [259 ITR 18]. This exercise shall be completed within a period of 12 weeks from date of receipt a copy of this order. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 31.10.2022 skaIndex : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non speaking Order To DR.ANITA SUMANTH,J.ska 1.Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward, 13(4), Chennai2.Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 10 121 Mahathma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam Chennai.3.Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward 1(1) Room 412, 4[th] Floor, Tower-1, BSNL Building, 16 Greams Road, Chennai-064.Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation Ward 1(1) Room 412, 4[th] Floor, Tower-1, BSNL Building, 16 Greams Road, Chennai-06 W.P.No.35381,928 & 934 of 2019 &WMP.No.36206, 36208, 26209 & 1045 of 2019 31.10.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan