Case Law › High Court › Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash96, Luz Chur...

Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash96, Luz Church Roadmylapore v. Appellant(S

High Court 07 Oct 2025 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hc_cis_mas

Parties

Date of order

07 Oct 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash96, Luz Church Roadmylapore v. Appellant(S, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP Nos.21021 & 21010 of 2025 inW.A.Nos.SR 127169 & 127153 of 2025 CMP No.21021 of 2025 Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash96, Luz Church RoadMylapore-600004Tamil Nadu, India. Vs Appellant(s) Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Wing, Central Cir 2 (1) Investigation WingRoom No. B3, Ground FloorNew No. 46, M.G. RoadChennai 34 and another For Appellant(s): Mr.M.V.Swaroop For Respondent(s): Mr.A.P.SrinivasSenior Standing Counsel Respondent(s) ___________ Page 1 of 3 ___________ Page 2 of 3 CMP Nos.21021 & 21010 of 2025 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on the applications seeking to condone the delay in re-presentation. 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay is condoned. Applications are allowed. 3. List the appeals for admission. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 07.10.2025 kpl ___________ Page 3 of 3

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.