In Rajaram N. Shankar v. Income Tax Officer & Ors, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
abs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1930 OF 1996
Rajaram N. ShankarV/sIncome Tax Officer & Ors.
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Mr. K.B. Bhujle for the petitioner.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the respondents.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ.DATE : 24TH AUGUST 2009
P.C.:
1.On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this petition. In the light of that, the petition is disposed off. Rule discharged with no order as to costs.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.