Rajat Sikka (Huf v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 30(1), New Delhi
High Court
30 Jan 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Rajat Sikka (Huf v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 30(1), New Delhi
Date of order
30 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rajat Sikka (Huf v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 30(1), New Delhi, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition shall stand dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~105
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3396/2023
RAJAT SIKKA (HUF)
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Madhur Aggarwal & Mr. Umashankar, Advs.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 30(1), NEW DELHI
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC with Mr. Parth Semwal, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, JSCs, Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Ms. Muskaan Goel & Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R30.01.2025
%
Learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw
the writ petition.
Ordered accordingly. The writ petition shall stand dismissed as withdrawn.
YASHWANT VARMA, J
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JJANUARY 30, 2025/akc
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue