Case LawHigh Court › Rajdeep Sales Agencry - Applicant(S v. C...

Rajdeep Sales Agencry - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S

High Court 09 Jan 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Rajdeep Sales Agencry - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S
Date of order
09 Jan 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Rajdeep Sales Agencry - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Reference stands disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 201 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI ====================================================Whether Reporters of Local Papers Whether Reporters of Local Papers 1may be allowed to see the judgment ?judgment ? 2[To be referred to the Reporter or ]not ?not ? 3[Whether their Lordships wish to see ]the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to 4the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5[Whether it is to be circulated to ]the civil judge ?the civil judge ? ==================================================== RAJDEEP SALES AGENCRY - Applicant(s) Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent(s) ==================================================== Appearance : NOTICE SERVEDfor Applicant(s) : 1,MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1,================================================ CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ITR/201/1995 and HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANIDate : 09/01/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) Despite service of notice there is no appearance on behalf of the applicant, nor has the applicant filed Paper Book as required by the Rules of this High Court. 2In these circumstances, the Reference is left unanswered for want of prosecution. Reference stands disposed of accordingly. (D.A.Mehta,J) (H.N.Devani, J) m.m.bhatt
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan