Rajdeep Sales Agencry - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S
High Court
09 Jan 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Rajdeep Sales Agencry - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S
Date of order
09 Jan 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Rajdeep Sales Agencry - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Reference stands disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 201 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
====================================================Whether Reporters of Local Papers Whether Reporters of Local Papers 1may be allowed to see the judgment ?judgment ?
2[To be referred to the Reporter or ]not ?not ?
3[Whether their Lordships wish to see ]the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to 4the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?
5[Whether it is to be circulated to ]the civil judge ?the civil judge ?
====================================================
RAJDEEP SALES AGENCRY - Applicant(s)
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent(s)
====================================================
Appearance :
NOTICE SERVEDfor Applicant(s) : 1,MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1,================================================
CORAM :
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
ITR/201/1995
and
HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANIDate : 09/01/2006
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
Despite service of notice there is no appearance on behalf of the applicant, nor has the applicant
filed Paper Book as required by the Rules of this High Court.
2In these circumstances, the Reference is left unanswered for want of prosecution. Reference stands disposed of accordingly.
(D.A.Mehta,J) (H.N.Devani, J)
m.m.bhatt
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.