In Rajeev Bhatia v. Dy. Com. Of Income Tax And Ors, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
R-110
+ W.P.(C) 4295/2002
RAJEEV BHATIA
..... Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
DY. COM. OF INCOME TAX AND ORS
..... Respondents
CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R11.03.2016
%
1. None appears for the Petitioner.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. It is made clear that the application for restoration will be entertained only
if it is supported by the affidavit of the party concerned. Also, an advance
copy should be served on the counsel who appeared last for the Respondents.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
MARCH 11, 2016/MK
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.