Case LawHigh Court › Rajendra Arjandas Makhijani v. Assistant...

Rajendra Arjandas Makhijani v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle (1

High Court 08 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Rajendra Arjandas Makhijani v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle (1
Date of order
08 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rajendra Arjandas Makhijani v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle (1, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of such statement being made by Mr.Soparkar, this Tax Appeal stands dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/CA/1341/2020 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1341 of 2020In F/TAX APPEAL NO. 2704 of 2020 With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 2704 of 2020 ========================================================== RAJENDRA ARJANDAS MAKHIJANI Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE (1) ========================================================== Appearance: MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Applicant(s) No. 1DS AFF.NOT FILED (R)(71) for the Respondent(s) No. 1========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATHand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Date : 08/03/2021COMMON ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH) Mr.B.S.Soparkar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that he has instructions from his client not to press this Tax Appeal as his client wants to avail the benefits of the ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’. In view of such statement being made by Mr.Soparkar, this Tax Appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. We clarify that we have otherwise not gone into the merits of the matter. As the Tax Appeal is dismissed as not pressed, the connected civil application seeking condonation of delay would also not survive and the same stands disposed of. (VIKRAM NATH, CJ) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan