In Rajendra Menon) (C v. Sirpurkar) Judge Judge, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
mrs.mishra
ITA No.14/2014
18/12/2014.
Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for thepetitioner.
The question involved in this appealunder Section 260A of the Income Tax Act hasalready been considered and rejected by thisCourt in ITA No.13/2014 decided on 19.3.2014and thereafter, again today while dismissingReview Petition No.587/2014. As this case andthe question involved in ITA No.13/2014 aredecided by a common order, we see no reason totake a different view in this case.
Accordingly, for the grounds andreasons already indicated by us in the orderpassed on 19.3.2014 in ITA No.13/2014 andtoday in Review Petition No.587/2014, thisappeal is also dismissed.
(Rajendra Menon) (C. V. Sirpurkar) Judge Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.