Case LawHigh Court › Rajendra Singh v. Income Tax Officer, Wa...

Rajendra Singh v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Jaipur

High Court 15 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Rajendra Singh v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Jaipur
Date of order
15 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rajendra Singh v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Jaipur, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for thereasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaidcases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4156/2022 Rajendra Singh S/o Shri Himmat Singh, Having His Address At D-66A,Sawai Madho Singh Road, Bani Park, Jaipur In The State Of Rajasthan- 302001 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Jaipur Having Its Address AtNew Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan - 302005New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan - 302005 2. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Ministry Of Finance, Having ItsAddress At North Block, New Delhi-110011 Through ItsChairman.Address At North Block, New Delhi-110011 Through ItsChairman. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka, Advocate HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAINJudgment / Order 15/03/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset would submit thatthe issue involved in this petition is no longer res integra as it has beenput to an end by Division Bench of this Court in the decision renderedon 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) &Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022 and batch of petitions) wherethe notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 havebeen found to be invalid and impermissible in law and quashed. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for thereasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaidcases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed. (SAMEER JAIN),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan