Case Law › High Court › Rajesh Kumar Agarwal Son Of Shri S.n. Ag...

Rajesh Kumar Agarwal Son Of Shri S.n. Agarwal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (4), Jaipur

High Court 12 Nov 2020 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

12 Nov 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rajesh Kumar Agarwal Son Of Shri S.n. Agarwal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (4), Jaipur, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1260/2020 Rajesh Kumar Agarwal Son Of Shri S.n. Agarwal, Aged About 42Years, Having His Address At G.r.d. Gems, B-185, Nehru Nagar,Jhotwara Road, Jaipur 302012 In The State Of Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (4), Jaipur Having Its Address AtNew Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Bhagwan DasRoad, C-Scheme, Jaipur In The State Of Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Muzaffar Iqbal for Mr.Siddarth Ranka For Respondent(s): Mr.RB Mathur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR Order 12/11/2020 Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has alreadyapproached the Department under “Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020” and as such, he does not want to argue the matter onmerits. Accordingly, prayer is made to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissedas withdrawn. (ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J Preeti Asopa/70

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.