Rajesh Kumar M/S Naveen Emporium, Gurudwara Road, Haridwar …..….……… v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, And Others. ………………
High Court
30 Aug 2003 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Rajesh Kumar M/S Naveen Emporium, Gurudwara Road, Haridwar …..….……… v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, And Others. ………………
Date of order
30 Aug 2003
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rajesh Kumar M/S Naveen Emporium, Gurudwara Road, Haridwar …..….……… v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, And Others. ………………, the High Court (2003) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Since no substantial question of law arises in this matter, this appeal under Section 2602-A is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE COURT OF HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
Income Tax Appeal No. 87 of 2003
Rajesh Kumar M/s Naveen Emporium, Gurudwara Road, Haridwar …..….………
Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, And others. ……………….. Respondents
Mr. V.K.Bist, Advocate for the Appellant Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the respondents.
Coram: Hon. S.H.Kapadia, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J.
Date: 30.08.2003:
PC:
On 17.12.1992 the appellant – assessee filed his return of income for the assessment year 1992-93, showing income of Rs. 2940/-. The Assessment Officer added back Rs. 4,45,000/- to the income of the assessee as the assessee failed to prove that it was received as advance for sale of property. In appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) reduced the addition. Being aggrieved, both the parties went in appeal to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which dismissed the appeals.
Since no substantial question of law arises in this matter, this appeal under Section 2602-A is dismissed.
(Irshad Hussain, J.)
(S.H. Kapadia, C.J.)
AK:
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.