Case Law › High Court › Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assi...

Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1,Chandigarh And Others

High Court 22 Apr 2022 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

22 Apr 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1,Chandigarh And Others, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE 22.04.2022Dinesh (PANKAJ JAIN)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWP-8 186-2022(O&M)Date of decision: 22.04.2022 Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust ... Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1,Chandigarh and others.... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICEK PANKAJ JAIN Present:Mr. Salil Kapor, Advocate andMs. Soumya Singh, Advocatefor the petitioner. FE FE FS TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J (ORAL) Counsel at the very outset seeks withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a petition afresh on the same cause of action,but with better particulars. Prayer is allowed. Disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE 22.04.2022Dinesh (PANKAJ JAIN)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes. Whether ReportableNo

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.