Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust— v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions Circle 1 Chandigarh &Others
High Court
18 Jul 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust— v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions Circle 1 Chandigarh &Others
Date of order
18 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust— v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions Circle 1 Chandigarh &Others, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether speaking/reasonedYes/No2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12105-2022 (O&M)Date of decision: 18.07.202
Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust— Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions Circle 1 Chandigarh &others
... Respondents
CQRAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRBJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK PANKAJ JAIN.
Present:Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate,Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocate and|Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the respondents.
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. (QRAL).
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outsetapprises this Court that against the impugned assessment order for theassessment year 2015-16, the statutory remedy of appeal under Section246-A of the Income Tax Act has already been availed of,
In view of the above, payer is made for withdrawal of thewrit petition with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal on all thegrounds and contentions raised therein.
Prayer is allowed.
Disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
For the sake of clarification, it is reiterated that we have not
CWP-12105-2022 (O&M)
examined the issue on merits.
(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE
18.07.2022harjeet
(PANKAJ JAIN)JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasonedYes/No2. Whether ReportableYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.