Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh Andothers
High Court
25 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh Andothers
Date of order
25 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh Andothers, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
CM-2007-C WP-2022 IN/ANCWP-1286-2022
-|-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHAN DIGAR
ale a
CM-2007-CwP-2022 IN/ANDCWPRP-1286-202Date of Decision: 25.02.2022
Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust
Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh andothers...Respondents
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON’BLE MR. JUSTICK PANKAJ JAIN
Present : Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate,Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocate,Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocate,Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Advocate,for the petitioner.
AJAY TEWARI_J. (Oral)
CMm2007mCWPa2022
This is an application for staying the proceedings initiated pursuantto the impugned notice dated 31.03.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income
Tax Act.
Notice of the application,
On asking of the Court, Mr. Denesh Goyal, Senior StandingCounsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondentsand with the consent oflearned counsel for the parties, the main case is taken on Board today itself.
CWP12862022
In two similar writ petitions (pertaining to separate years) i.e. CWP-1252-2022 and CWP-1189-2022, the respondents have admittedly supplied thereasons recorded for reopening the assessment and the learned counsel appearingfor the revenue department has stated that even the approval granted by theCommissioner of Income Tax would be supplied to the petitioner.
In this view of the matter, it is directed that in this case also the
reasons recorded as well as the approval of the Commissioner of Income Tax besupplied to the petitioner within a period of ten days, as has been directed in theabove-said writ petitions.
Since the main case has been decided, the pending civilmiscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of,
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.