Case LawHigh Court › Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assi...

Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh Andothers

High Court 25 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh Andothers
Date of order
25 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh Andothers, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

CM-2007-C WP-2022 IN/ANCWP-1286-2022 -|- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHAN DIGAR ale a CM-2007-CwP-2022 IN/ANDCWPRP-1286-202Date of Decision: 25.02.2022 Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh andothers...Respondents CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON’BLE MR. JUSTICK PANKAJ JAIN Present : Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate,Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocate,Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocate,Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Advocate,for the petitioner. AJAY TEWARI_J. (Oral) CMm2007mCWPa2022 This is an application for staying the proceedings initiated pursuantto the impugned notice dated 31.03.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Notice of the application, On asking of the Court, Mr. Denesh Goyal, Senior StandingCounsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondentsand with the consent oflearned counsel for the parties, the main case is taken on Board today itself. CWP12862022 In two similar writ petitions (pertaining to separate years) i.e. CWP-1252-2022 and CWP-1189-2022, the respondents have admittedly supplied thereasons recorded for reopening the assessment and the learned counsel appearingfor the revenue department has stated that even the approval granted by theCommissioner of Income Tax would be supplied to the petitioner. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in this case also the reasons recorded as well as the approval of the Commissioner of Income Tax besupplied to the petitioner within a period of ten days, as has been directed in theabove-said writ petitions. Since the main case has been decided, the pending civilmiscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of,
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan