Case LawHigh Court › Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assi...

Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh And

High Court 25 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh And
Date of order
25 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh And, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

CM-1992-CWP-2022 IN/ANDCWP-1189-2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHAN DIGAR ale a CM-1992-CWP-2022 IN/ANDCWPRP-1189-202Date of Decision: 25.02.2022 Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemptions Circle 1, Chandigarh and others ...Respondents CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON’BLE MR. JUSTICK PANKAJ JAIN Present : Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate,Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocate,Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocate,Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Advocate,for the petitioner. AJAY TEWARI_J. (Oral) CMm1992mCWPa2022 This is an application for staying the proceedings initiated pursuantto the impugned notice dated 31.03.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Notice of the application, On asking of the Court, Mr. Denesh Goyal, Senior StandingCounsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondentsand with the consent oflearned counsel for the parties, the main case 1s taken on Board today itself. CWPa1189m2022 On 28.01.2022, the following order was passed:- 6Notice ofmotion.On the asking of the Court, Mr. Dinesh Goyal,Senior Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of therespondents. He prays for time to seek necessaryinstructions.It is Mr. Kapoor's contention that an interim order has to be passed in CWP No.1276 of2022.Notice regarding stay as well.Adjourned to 08.02.2022.To be heard along with CWP No.1252 of2022.A photocopy of this order be placed on the file ofother connected case.7 Today, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that reasons forreopening have been supplied to the petitioner but he had also made a prayer that acopy of the approval granted by the Commissioner of Income Tax be alsosupplied. Mr. Goyal has very fairly stated that this copy can also be supplied. In the circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction tothe respondents to supply a copy of the approval granted by the Commissioner ofIncome Tax within a period of ten days and thereafter, the petitioner would take itsremedy in accordance with law. Since the main case has been decided, the pending civilmiscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARITJUDGE (PANKAJ JAIN)JUDGE 25.02.2022adhikariWhether speaking/non-speaking Yes/NoWhether reportableYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan