Rajkumar Golecha v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Department, Jodhpur
High Court
15 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Rajkumar Golecha v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Department, Jodhpur
Date of order
15 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rajkumar Golecha v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Department, Jodhpur, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3457 / 2018
Rajkumar Golecha S/o Labh Chand Ji, Aged About 43 Years,Resident of Gundochya Baas, Pali Marwar.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Department, Jodhpur.
2. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Department, CentralCircle-2, Jodhpur.Circle-2, Jodhpur.
3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) Central, Udaipur.
4. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2Jodhpur.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3458 / 2018
Smt. Vinita Devi Golecha, W/o Rajkumar Golecha, Aged About 42Years, Resident of Gundochya Baas, Pali Marwar.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Department, Jodhpur.
2. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Department, CentralCircle-2 Jodhpur.
3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) Central, Udaipur.
4. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2Jodhpur.
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sundeep Bhandawat
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Order
15/03/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the appeal isbeing heard and shall definitely be concluded by 31[st] March, 2018.
In view of the said statement, this Court deems it proper todispose of the present writ petitions with a direction that nocoercive action shall be taken against the petitioners for recoveryof the demand uptill 31[st] March, 2018. In case, the said appeal innot decided by 31[st] March, 2018, the stay granted by this Courtshall be deemed to have been automatically vacated and therespondents will be at liberty to recover the said amountthereafter.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR), J.
arvind/53-54
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue