Case LawHigh Court › Rajvir Singh Yadav Foundation v. Income...

Rajvir Singh Yadav Foundation v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 08 Jul 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Rajvir Singh Yadav Foundation v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Jul 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rajvir Singh Yadav Foundation v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition and applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4024/2020 & CM APPL. 14429-14431/2020 RAJVIR SINGH YADAV FOUNDATION ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Madan with Mr. Amol Sinha, Mr. Nitin Gulati and Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Advocates versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(4), EXEMPTIONS, DELHI ....... Respondent Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R08.07.2020 % The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file appropriate legal proceedings in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition and applications are dismissed as withdrawn. All the rights and contention of the parties are left open. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail. MANMOHAN, J JULY 08, 2020 rn SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan