Rakesh Karsanbhai Patel v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3(1)(1
High Court
24 Feb 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Rakesh Karsanbhai Patel v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3(1)(1
Date of order
24 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Rakesh Karsanbhai Patel v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3(1)(1, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C/CA/564/2021 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 564 of 2021
In
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 63 of 2021
==========================================================
RAKESH KARSANBHAI PATEL
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1)(1)
==========================================================Appearance:MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
andHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Date : 24/02/2021 ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
1. We have heard Mr. B.S.Soparkar, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicant. for the writ applicant.
2. Having regard to the averments made in this application and the sufficient cause assigned, the delay of 15 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.sufficient cause assigned, the delay of 15 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
3. The Civil Application is accordingly allowed.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
SUCHIT
(ILESH J. VORA,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue