Rakesh Kumar Bhalotia v. Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Center,Rom
High Court
14 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Rakesh Kumar Bhalotia v. Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Center,Rom
Date of order
14 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rakesh Kumar Bhalotia v. Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Center,Rom, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to file astatutory appeal available to the writ-petitioner.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7123/2022
Rakesh Kumar Bhalotia S/o Brijlal Bhalotia, Aged About 52Years, R/o L-134, Ashiana Angan, Bhiwadi, Dist Alwar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Center,Rom No. 401, 2Nd Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal NehruStadium, Delhi- 110003.
2. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Alwar, CR Building, Moti Doongri Road, Alwar, Rajasthan, 301001.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakul Khurana Advocate.For Respondent(s): Ms. Parinitoo Jain Advocate.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Judgment / Order
14/07/2022
Ms. Parinitoo Jain, Advocate enter appearance on behalf ofrespondents-Revenue on advance copy.
Heard.
Though number of grounds have been urged by the writ-petitioner, we are not satisfied that any of the ground is a totalabsence of jurisdiction or violation of principles of natural justiceor is there any allegation that the order is actuated by mala-fide.Therefore, in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble SupremeCourt in the case of Whirlpool Corporation Versus Registrarof Trade Marks, Mumbai, 1998 (8) Supreme Court Cases 1,we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to file astatutory appeal available to the writ-petitioner.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J
Sanjay Kumawat-4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.