Rakesh Kumar Jain v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, International Taxation,Central Revenue Building, Janpath Jaipur
High Court
09 May 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Rakesh Kumar Jain v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, International Taxation,Central Revenue Building, Janpath Jaipur
Date of order
09 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
2012-2013
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Rakesh Kumar Jain v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, International Taxation,Central Revenue Building, Janpath Jaipur, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed in the sameterms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19576/2019
Rakesh Kumar Jain, S/o Shri Vijay Kumar Jain, Aged About 53Years, Resident Of 3-Na-30, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, International Taxation,Central Revenue Building, Janpath Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dileep ShivpuriFor Respondent(s): Mr. Shantanu Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
09/05/2024
1.This petition is filed seeking quashing of impugned noticeissued under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated30.03.2019 for Assessment Year 2012-2013.
2.Learned counsel for the parties are at ad-idem that the issueinvolved in the present petition is covered by the decision of thisCourt in D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.18363/2019 (Shyam SunderKhandelwal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) decided on19.03.2024.
3.In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed in the sameterms.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Simple Kumawat /42
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue