Rakesh Saraogi v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax I (1) Room
High Court
30 Mar 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Rakesh Saraogi v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax I (1) Room
Date of order
30 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rakesh Saraogi v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax I (1) Room, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPT No.43 of 2017
NAFR
Rakesh Saraogi S/o. Late Shri Satyanarayan Saraogi, Aged About 56 Years Prop. M/s. Madan Construction, Subhash Road, Gunj Para, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Prop. M/s. Madan Construction, Subhash Road, Gunj Para, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax I (1) Room No. 218, 1st Floor, Ayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Ayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) (Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondents
For Petitioner:Shri Romir Sumit Goyal, AdvocateFor Respondents:Ms. Noushina Afrin Ali, Advocate
30/03/2017
Heard.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
2.Learned counsel for the parties agreed that this petition can be disposed off in terms of order dated 19-10-2016 passed by this Court in W.P.(T)No.142 of 2016 (Dr. (Smt.) Sarita Bajpai vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I and others).
3.In view of submission made above, this writ petition is also finally disposed off granting liberty to the petitioner to move an application for stay before the Assessment Officer within a period of 15 days from today. The Assessment Officer shall consider and decide the application for stay within an outer limit of four (4) weeks from the date of submission of application by the petitioner.
4.It is expected that the appellate authority shall also decide the pending appeal of the petitioner within an outer limit of eight (8) weeks from today.
Sd/-
(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.