In Rallis India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Range3(3) And 2 Ors, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 328 OF 2011
Rallis India Limited
V/S
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Range3(3) And 2 Ors.
....Petitioner
....Respondent
Mr. P.J.Pardiwala, Sr. Counsel a/w Mr. Jitendra Jain i/b Mr.Atul K. Jasani For PetitionerMr. Arvind Pinto For Respondent
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
A. K. MENON, JJDATE : 24th November, 2017
P.C. :
Arguments are concluded. Judgment is reserved.
( ASSOCIATE )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.