Case Law › High Court › Ram Babu Roy v. The Union Of India

Ram Babu Roy v. The Union Of India

High Court 29 Apr 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · patnahcucisdb94

Parties

Date of order

29 Apr 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ram Babu Roy v. The Union Of India, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the ground set-forth in the petition, same is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACriminal Miscellaneous No. 20347 of 2015 ====================================================== Ram Babu Roy .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The Union of India Through The Commissioner of Income Tax Central, Patna & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Alias Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMARORAL ORDER 2. 29-04-2015 Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Archana Sinha, learned Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department/opposite party. The present petition has been filed with a prayer to restore Cr. Misc. No. 31349 of 2012, which stood dismissed on 09-05-2014, due to non-prosecution. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the ground set-forth in the petition, same is allowed. Let Cr. Misc. No. 31349 of 2012 be restored to its original file. Anay/- (Rakesh Kumar, J.) U T

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.