Case Law › High Court › Ram Kishore Singh v. State Of Rajasthan,...

Ram Kishore Singh v. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

High Court 29 May 2024 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

29 May 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ram Kishore Singh v. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 4.Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition as well as pendingapplication(s), if any, stands dismissed as having renderedinfructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4778/2022 Ram Kishore Singh S/o Mr. Sati Prasad Singh, Aged About 39Years, R/o Second Floor, Class Of Pearl, Income Tax Colony,Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Swati Verma W/o Shri Saurav Dutta, Aged About 31Years, R/o 121-A, Block-B Caladium , Sector 109,Jahajgarh, Gurgaon.Years, R/o 121-A, Block-B Caladium , Sector 109,Jahajgarh, Gurgaon. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hariom Vyas for Mr. Nitish Kumar Bagri For Respondent(s): Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/05/2024 1.Instant petition has been filed by petitioner under Section482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR No. 68/2021 registered at PoliceStation Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur East for the offencespunishable under Sections 420, 406 and 120B of IPC. 2.Learned State Counsel places on record copy of factualreport dated 29.05.2024. According to the factual report, afterinvestigation police submitted negative final report in theconcerned Court on 13.09.2023 finding that the dispute betweenthe parties is of civil nature. 3.In view of the above factual position, prayer made in thiscriminal misc. petition does not survive anymore. 4.Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition as well as pendingapplication(s), if any, stands dismissed as having renderedinfructuous. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J LALIT MOHAN /249

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.