Ram Kripal Sisodia Son Of Shri Sultan Shah & Another v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Another

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4364/2023 Ram Kripal Sisodia Son of Shri Sultan Shah & Another ----Petitioners Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Another ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Khan Advocate.For Respondent(s): Mr. Siddharth Bapna Advocate withMr. Sarvesh Jain Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA 23/04/2025 Order 1.Mr. Ram Kripal Sisodia and Mr. Ramdhan Meena approach this Court with the following prayers:-“In light of the facts and circumstances of the case,averments made hereinabove as well as the settled legalposition, it is therefore, most humbly prayed that thisHon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow theinstant writ petition and - a)Issue writ in the nature of Mandamus of any otherappropriate Writ or Order directing the Respondents toissue appropriate instructions to the concerned RevenueAuthority i.e. Tehsildar – Amer [Dist. - Jaipur] forrevoking/removing the entry of attachment reflecting theRevenue Records in respect of the immovable andmovable properties enumertated in Para 11 of this WritPetition; andb)Direct the Respondents to pay costs of the presentwrit petition to the petitioners; andc)Grant any other relief as the Hon’ble Court maydeem fit and proper under the present facts andcircumstances of the case.” “In light of the facts and circumstances of the case,averments made hereinabove as well as the settled legalposition, it is therefore, most humbly prayed that thisHon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow theinstant writ petition and - a)Issue writ in the nature of Mandamus of any otherappropriate Writ or Order directing the Respondents toissue appropriate instructions to the concerned RevenueAuthority i.e. Tehsildar – Amer [Dist. - Jaipur] forrevoking/removing the entry of attachment reflecting theRevenue Records in respect of the immovable andmovable properties enumertated in Para 11 of this WritPetition; andb)Direct the Respondents to pay costs of the presentwrit petition to the petitioners; andc)Grant any other relief as the Hon’ble Court maydeem fit and proper under the present facts andcircumstances of the case.” 2.By an order dated 15th May 2024, the writ petition qua Ram Kripal Sisodia was dismissed. 3.Mr. Javed Khan, the learned counsel appearing for RamdhanMeena and Mr. Siddharth Bapna, the learned counsel appearing for Union of India agree that by virtue of the decision rendered byHon’ble Supreme Court in Review Petition (Civil) No. 359 of 2023in Civil Appeal No. 5783 of 2022 titled “Union of India & Anr. Vs.M/s Ganpati Dealcom Private Limited”, the present writ petitionhas become infructuous. 4.Disposed of as such. 5.Needless to indicate that the consequences shall follow. (ANAND SHARMA),J (SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR),J DIVYA SAINI /109