Case Law › High Court › Ram Nandan Singh v. Asst. Commissioner O...

Ram Nandan Singh v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr

High Court 09 Mar 2016 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

09 Mar 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ram Nandan Singh v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition and the pending application are accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8395/2015 & CM 17901/2015 RAM NANDAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Y.K. Kapoor, Advocate. versus ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Junior Standing Counsel and Mr. Sharad Agarwal, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % O R D E R 09.03.2016 1. Even at the time of filing of the present writ petition, the Petitioner’s appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the order impugned in the present writ petition was already pending. 2. The Court does not consider it appropriate to permit the Petitioner to bypass the statutory remedy already availed by the Petitioner. 3. The writ petition and the pending application are accordingly dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J MARCH 09, 2016 b’nesh VIBHU BAKHRU, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.