Case Law › High Court › Ram Singh Meena v. Union Of India

Ram Singh Meena v. Union Of India

High Court 11 Apr 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

11 Apr 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ram Singh Meena v. Union Of India, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 221/2019 Ram Singh Meena S/o Sh. Ramkaran, Aged About 50 Years, R/oMohalla Mainpura, Sawaimadhopur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Benami Transaction)And Initiating Officer Under The Prohibition Of BenamiProperty Transaction Act 1988, Room No. 250, StatueCircle, Ncrb, Income Tax Office, Jaipur.And Initiating Officer Under The Prohibition Of BenamiProperty Transaction Act 1988, Room No. 250, StatueCircle, Ncrb, Income Tax Office, Jaipur. 2. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Income TaxDepartment, Government Of India, New Delhi.Department, Government Of India, New Delhi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Lokesh Jangid, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR Order 11/04/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (ASHOK KUMAR GAUR), J Himanshu Soni/14

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.