Ramakanta v. S. Velingkar (Deceased) Through His Representative, Dattaraj Velingkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 754 OF 2019IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1023 OF 2015 RAMAKANTA V. S. VELINGKAR (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS REPRESENTATIVE, DATTARAJ VELINGKAR., Versus ... Applicant ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2, PANAJI AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Abhijit Pramod Gosavi, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Respondent. -Coram:M. S. SONAK & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.14th August, 2019 -Date: P.C.: Heard Mr. Abhijit Gosavi, learned Counsel for the applicant. Ms. A. Razaq, learned Standing Counsel for the Income taxDepartment. 2. Mr. Gosavi points out that by common judgment and order dated 09.07.2019, several writ petitions including Writ PetitionNo.141/2015 and Writ Petition No.1023/2015 came to bedisposed of. He points out that in the cause title, there is clear reference to Writ Petition No.1023/2015. However, in theoperative part at para 29, wherein Rule is made absolute, there isomission to refer to Writ Petition No.1023/2015. He submits thatfrom the context, it is very clear that even in Writ PetitionNo.1023/2015, Rule was made absolute. 3. Upon perusing the material on record, it thus appear thatthere was inadvertent omission as pointed out by Mr.Gosavi.there was inadvertent omission as pointed out by Mr.Gosavi. 4. Accordingly, in para 29 in the order dated 09.07.2019, in thethird line from the foot, we direct the insertion of reference toWrit Petition No. 1023/2015 after the reference to "1104/2017". 5. This correction be carried out in the original order as well asthe order uploaded on the website. the order uploaded on the website. 6. The application for speaking to the minutes is disposed of onthe aforesaid terms.the aforesaid terms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J. MF/- M. S. SONAK, J.