Ramakanta V.s.velingkar (Deceased) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-2, Panaji And 2 Ors
High Court
09 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Ramakanta V.s.velingkar (Deceased) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-2, Panaji And 2 Ors
Date of order
09 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ramakanta V.s.velingkar (Deceased) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-2, Panaji And 2 Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: P.C.: In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition, nothing survivesin the application which stands disposed of as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 137 OF 2017IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1019 OF 2015
RAMAKANTA V.S.VELINGKAR (DECEASED), THROUGH ITS REPRESENTATIVE DATTARAJ VELINGKAR.,
Versus
... Applicant
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2, PANAJI AND 2 ORS.,
... Respondents
Mr. Abhijit Pramod Gosavi, Advocate for the Applicant.Mr. K.V. Aravind, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Y.V.Raviraj, Ms. Susan Linhares and Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq,Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
-Coram:S. C. GUPTE &-Date:9th July, 2019
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
P.C.:
In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition, nothing survivesin the application which stands disposed of as infructuous.
NH
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
S. C. GUPTE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue