Raman Dharampal Kapoor v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Acit-Cir 2, Aurangabad
High Court
09 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Raman Dharampal Kapoor v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Acit-Cir 2, Aurangabad
Date of order
09 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Raman Dharampal Kapoor v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Acit-Cir 2, Aurangabad, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 615 OF 2018
ININCOME TAX APPEAL ST.NO.28404 OF 2017
Raman Dharampal Kapoor..Applicant
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax,ACIT-CIR 2, Aurangabad..Respondent
Mr D.V. Soman, Advocate h/f Mr A.A. Yadkikar, Advocate for applicant Mr Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. DHAVALE, JJ
PER COURT
DATE : 9[th] February 2018
1.Notice to respondent. Learned Counsel Mr Sharma accepts notice on behalf of respondent.
2.This is an application for condonation of delay of 61 days in filing the appeal.
3.For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Civil Application disposed of.
( A.M. DHAVALE, J.)
( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vvr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue