Case LawHigh Court › Ramasamy Krishnamoorthy v. Income-Tax Of...

Ramasamy Krishnamoorthy v. Income-Tax Officer

High Court 15 Nov 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Ramasamy Krishnamoorthy v. Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
15 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ramasamy Krishnamoorthy v. Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 7.This writ petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.No.644 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 15.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH WP.No.644 of 2020 andWMP.Nos.756 & 759 of 2020 Ramasamy Krishnamoorthy,69, Karumarampalayam,Uthukuli Main Road,Tirupur – 641 607,Tamil Nadu, India.... Petitioner Vs Income-Tax Officer, Office of Assistant Commissioner of Income,Circle 1, Tirupur.... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Respondent pertaining to the assessment Order dated 30.12.2019 bearing Order No.ITBA/ AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1023465850(1), and the consequential demand notice dated 30.12.2019, issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Akhil Bhansali For Respondent: Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel W.P.No.644 of 2020 O R D E R Heard Mr.Akhil Bansali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2.The challenge is to an order of assessment passed under the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'Act') for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18. The main argument advanced, that which the Court finds quite acceptable is that the impugned order has not been preceded with sufficient or adequate opportunity and hence is contrary to the provisions of natural justice. 3. The show cause notice that has been issued pre-assessment is dated 27.12.2019 and has been forwarded under cover of an e-mail dated 27.12.2019 at 09.19 p.m. listing the matter for hearing the next morning i.e. on 28.12.2019 at 11.15 a.m. 4.In spite of the inadequate time that was furnished to the petitioner, a reply has been filed on 27.12.2019, wherein the petitioner expresses his inability to collect all the particulars that have been sought for under the show cause notice and seeks 48 hours time for submission of the remaining particulars. This request has been ignored and the impugned order has come to be passed on 30.12.2019 without affording any opportunity to the petitioner. 5.This Court is of the view that the impugned order is in utter violation of the principles of natural justice and hence sets aside the same.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.644 of 2020 6.The petitioner shall file a response to the show cause notice dated 27.12.2019 along with supporting documents within two (2) weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order, for which purpose, the website shall be enabled. The petitioner shall be heard thereafter and an order of assessment passed denovo, in accordance with law. Let the entirety of this exercise be completed within a period of twelve (12) weeks from date of receipt of this order. 7.This writ petition is allowed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes / NoSpeaking Order vs 15.11.2022 To Income-Tax Officer,Office of Assistant Commissioner of Income,Circle 1, Tirupur. W.P.No.644 of 2020 Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J. vs WP.No.644 of 2020 andWMP.Nos.756 & 759 of 2020 15.11.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan