Ramesh C. Shah … v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range-19(2) …
High Court
03 Dec 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ramesh C. Shah … v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range-19(2) …
Date of order
03 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ramesh C. Shah … v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range-19(2) …, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1466 OF 2012
Ramesh C. Shah… Appellant
Vs.Addl. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Range-19(2) … Respondent
.....
Mr. Nishit Gandhi, i/b. Sameer G. Dalal, for the Appellant.Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, for the Respondent.
….CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND S.C. GUPTE, JJ.
DATE : 03 DECEMBER 2014
PC :
.After having heard Mr. Gandhi, with his assistance perusing the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Income Tax Appeal No.5426/M/2009 delivered on 28 October 2011 and impugned in this appeal, we are of the opinion that the order and particular direction in para 7 does not raise any substantial question of law. On the facts and peculiar to the assessee that direction has been issued, the matter will have to be re-examined by the Assessing Officer in accordance with law. We direct the Assessing Officer to do accordingly and complete the assessment as expeditiously as possible and within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The Appeal is dismissed.
(S.C.GUPTE, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Pg 1 of 1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.