Ramesh Kumar Gupta v. Chief Commissioner, Income Tax Department Dehradun
High Court
29 Mar 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Ramesh Kumar Gupta v. Chief Commissioner, Income Tax Department Dehradun
Date of order
29 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ramesh Kumar Gupta v. Chief Commissioner, Income Tax Department Dehradun, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.1079 (M/S) 2009
Ramesh Kumar Gupta S/o Late Ram Kumar Gupta
-Petitioner
Versus
Chief Commissioner, Income Tax Department Dehradun
- Respondent
Sri Gopal K. Verma, Advocate for petitioner
Sri H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the respondent
[Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.(Oral)]
Heard Sri Gopal K. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner and Sri
H.M. Bhatia, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent.
By means of this petition the petitioner has sought the following relief:-
(1) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 1-6-2009, passed by respondent, Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. quashing the impugned order dated 1-6-2009, passed by respondent, Annexure No.1 to the writ petition.
(2) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to register the petitioner as valuer U/S 34-A, B, of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. directing the respondent to register the petitioner as valuer U/S 34-A, B, of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957.
(3) Any other order or direction, which is this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
(4) Award cost to the petitioner.
During the course of argument, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh application before the respondent as per qualification of the petitioner.
Permission is granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
However liberty is given to petitioner to move fresh application before the respondent as per his qualification for his registration as valuer under Wealth Tax Act 1957. If such application is moved by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the respondent in accordance with rules, expeditiously as far as possible, preferably,
within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
(B.S.Verma, J.) 29-3-2012
ISB
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.