Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Rangabashyam Mahalakshmi v. The Income T...

Rangabashyam Mahalakshmi v. The Income Tax Officer, Int. Taxn Ward 1(2) Che, Room

High Court 24 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Rangabashyam Mahalakshmi v. The Income Tax Officer, Int. Taxn Ward 1(2) Che, Room
Date of order
24 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2020-2021
Outcome
Other

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rangabashyam Mahalakshmi v. The Income Tax Officer, Int. Taxn Ward 1(2) Che, Room, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Issue: The respondents after ascertaining the details as to whether the refund of amount were kept pending before the Centralised Processing Centre or before the concerned Bank, the representation of the petitioner towards interest will be considered.

Decision: 6.In the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of .

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 24.03.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLEMR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.10639 of 2024 Rangabashyam Mahalakshmi,38, Venkatnarayana Road,T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017,Tamil Nadu – India. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Income Tax Officer, Int. Taxn Ward 1(2) Che, Room No.413, BSNL Building, No.16, Greams Raod, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 006. 2.Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 3.Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, Income Tax Department, Main Building, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 4.Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation Range -I, Income Tax Department, Chennai – 600 006. International Taxation Range -I, Income Tax Department, Chennai – 600 006. 1/8 W.P.No.10639 of 2024 5.Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax), 4[th] Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Circus, New Delhi. 6.Income Tax Department Centralized Processing Centre (CPC), 1[st] Floor, Prestige Alpha No.48/1, Hosur Rd, Uttarahalli, Hobli, Bengaluru, Karnataka – 560 100. ... Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1[st] respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.01.2024 and consequently issue the interest on refund due under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, till the date of granting of refund for Assessment Year 2020-2021. For Petitioner : Mr.Gayathri.S For Respondent: Mr.B.Ramanakumar, Senior Standing Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.01.2024 and consequently issue the interest on refund due under Section 2/8 W.P.No.10639 of 2024 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, till the date of granting of refund for Assessment Year 2020-2021. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that for the Assessment Year 2020-2021, the petitioner filed the return on 29.12.2020 under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred as 'the Act'). Subsequently, an intimation order under Section 143(1) of the Act, was also issued to the petitioner on 21.09.2021, stating that the petitioner was entitled to a refund of Rs.4,35,33,770/-. However, there were some confusions with respect to refund, as the respondents claimed that the refund deposited into the petitioner' account while no such amount was credited into the petitioner's bank account. After the continuous follow ups till 01.11.2023, it was discovered that the refund determined in this case was pending before the CPC ITR. Further, a mail from the Chennai ITO (Hqrs) (Coord) on 03.11.2023 stated that the petitioner's request for a refund was forwarded to the CPC-ITR, Bengalur and that there is a β€œtechnical code fix” that is required to release the refund. Finally, the petitioner received the refund of Rs.4,35,33,762/- on 26.12.2023. However, it was discovered that 3/8 W.P.No.10639 of 2024 the said amount does not include interest as mandated under Section 244A of the Act. Therefore, the petitioner's made a representation dated 12.01.2024 to the 1st respondent stating that the interest for the refund was calculated incorrectly. However, the petitioner did not receive any reply for the said representation till date. Hence, the present writ petition. 3.Learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that due to some technical glitch, there was a delay in payment of refund. The respondents after ascertaining the details as to whether the refund of amount were kept pending before the Centralised Processing Centre or before the concerned Bank, the representation of the petitioner towards interest will be considered. 4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 5.Considering the submissions made by the either side counsel, 3.Learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that due to some technical glitch, there was a delay in payment of refund. The respondents after ascertaining the details as to whether the refund of amount were kept pending before the Centralised Processing Centre or before the concerned Bank, the representation of the petitioner towards interest will be considered. 4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 5.Considering the submissions made by the either side counsel, the 1st respondent is directed consider the representation of the petitioner 4/8 W.P.No.10639 of 2024 dated 12.01.2024, seeking for the residual interest till the date of payment made, within a period of eight weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and pay the interest. 6.In the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of . No costs. rst 24.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes/No To: 1.The Income Tax Officer, Int. Taxn Ward 1(2) Che, Room No.413, BSNL Building, No.16, Greams Raod, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 006. Int. Taxn Ward 1(2) Che, Room No.413, BSNL Building, No.16, Greams Raod, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 006. 2.Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 5/8 3.Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, Income Tax Department, Main Building, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, Income Tax Department, Main Building, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 4.Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation Range -I, Income Tax Department, Chennai – 600 006. International Taxation Range -I, Income Tax Department, Chennai – 600 006. 5.Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax), 4[th] Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Circus, New Delhi. Connaught Circus, New Delhi. 6.Income Tax Department Centralized Processing Centre (CPC), 1[st] Floor, Prestige Alpha No.48/1, Hosur Rd, Uttarahalli, Hobli, Bengaluru, Karnataka – 560 100. 6/8 7/8 W.P.No.10639 of 2024 8/8 W.P.No.10639 of 2024 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. rst W.P.No.10639 of 2024 24.03.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… Get help with an income-tax notice β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan