Case LawHigh Court › Ranjeet Birani v. Income Tax Officer, Wa...

Ranjeet Birani v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (1), New Central Revenue Building,Janpath, Jaipur

High Court 05 Jul 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Ranjeet Birani v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (1), New Central Revenue Building,Janpath, Jaipur
Date of order
05 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ranjeet Birani v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (1), New Central Revenue Building,Janpath, Jaipur, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2360/2020 Ranjeet Birani S/o Shri Ratan Lal, Aged About 58 Years, B-89,Shubham, Ganesh Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (1), New Central Revenue Building,Janpath, Jaipur. ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 357/2020 Chandra Prakash Agroya S/o Late Shri Bansilal Agroya, AgedAbout 70 Years, D-46/b, Subhash Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (2), New Central Revenue Building,Janpath, Jaipur. ----Respondent D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2760/2020 Ashok Kumar Dusad S/o Shri Ram Sharan Dusad, Aged About 56Years, Resident Of K-08, Malviya Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-04, New CentralRevenue Building, Janpath, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dileep Shivpuri with Mr. Utkarsh SharaFor Respondent(s): Mr. Siddharth BapnaMr. Sarvesh JainMs. Kriti KalawatiaMr. Meyhul Mittal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR 05/07/2024 This petition is filed seeking quashing of notice issued underSection 148 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year2012-13 and the assessment order. Learned counsel for the parties are at ad idem that the factsof the present case are similar to that of DBCWP No.13424/2021(Siddharth Totuka vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax)decided on 18.04.2024 wherein, the writ petition was allowed interms of the decision of this Court passed in Shyam SunderKhandelwal vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (D.B. CivilWrit Petition No.18363/2019) and connected petitions. The petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of thisCourt dated 18.04.2024 passed in the case of Siddharth Totuka(supra). (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Simple Kumawat /29-31
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan