Ranjit Kumar Son Of Sri Ashok Kumar Gupta Resident Of Mohulla -Income Tax Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.s.- Agamkuan, District - Patna v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54402 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2513 Year-2020 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASEDistrict- Muzaffarpur ======================================================RANJIT KUMAR Son of Sri Ashok Kumar Gupta Resident of Mohulla -Income Tax Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S.- Agamkuan, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bihar 2.Premlata Kumari Wife of Ranjit Kumar Daughter of Dinesh Prasad Gupta,At present Resident of Mohulla - Bhagwanpur (Near Noonfar), P.S.- Sadar(Muzaffarpur), District - Muzaffarpur. 704-08-2023 ... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Tejendra Sinha, AdvocateFor the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP Mr. D.K. Sinha, Sr. Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Senior Advocate for the complainant and learned A.P.P. for theState. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connectionwith Complaint Case No. 2513 of 2020 registered for theoffences punishable under Sections 498 of the Indian PenalCode read with Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thepetitioner being husband has been falsely implicated in thepresent case along with his family members. It is next submittedthat initially petitioner made endeavours to revive his conjugal relationship and had filed an application under Section 9 of theHindu Marriage Act also but then the present complaint came tobe instituted and now it is not possible to revive the conjugalrelationship. It is further submitted that the petitioner will pay amonthly maintenance of Rs. 18,000/- to the complainanttowards her maintenance along with the maintenance of thechild who is presently studying in DAV School. 4. Learned Senior Advocate for the complainant doesnot dispute the submission of the learned counsel for thepetitioner and submits that the learned Advocate on record willprovide the bank account number of the complainant on theWhatsApp of the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to forward thesame to the petitioner so that the monthly maintenance, asagreed, starts getting credited in the account of the complainantfrom 16.08.2023. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in theevent of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court belowwithin a period of six weeks from today, be released onanticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (RupeesFive Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Rishi/- UT satisfaction of the learned court below where the case ispending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No.2513 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down underSection 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. 6. However, the complainant will be at liberty to filean application seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bailgranted to the petitioner before this Court, in the event, if thepetitioner does not credit the maintenance amount, as agreed,for two consecutive months in her account. (Satyavrat Verma, J)