Ranoli Investment Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Jul 2002 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Ranoli Investment Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Jul 2002
Assessment year(s)
1983-84
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ranoli Investment Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2002) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ RANOLI INVESTMENT PVT LTDVersus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 75 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ RANOLI INVESTMENT PVT LTDVersus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 75 of 1992 MR RK PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ
Date of decision: 17/07/2002
(Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�In this reference at the instance of the
assessee, the following question is referred for our
opinion in respect of assessment year 1983-84:-
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case, the Tribunal is right in law in coming
to the conclusion that the amount of
Rs.16,032/paid during the asstt. year under
consideration and being the short provision for taxation pertaining to the earlier asstt. was not deductible u/s.109 for purposes of computing
the distributable income u/s.104?"
2.�We have heard Mr RK Patel, learned counsel for
the applicant- assessee and Mr Manish R Bhatt, learned
Sr. Standing Counsel for the revenue.
3.�Having gone through the order of the Assessing
Officer, the appellate order and the Tribunal's order and
having regard to the smallness of the amount, we decline
to answer the question referred for our opinion.
4.�The Reference accordingly stands disposed of with
no order as to costs.
���(M.S. Shah,J)�(K.A. Puj,J)
zgs/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.