R.a.palanisamyc/O Mr.s.sridhar Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward I(2), Erode
High Court
19 Dec 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
R.a.palanisamyc/O Mr.s.sridhar Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward I(2), Erode
Date of order
19 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In R.a.palanisamyc/O Mr.s.sridhar Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward I(2), Erode, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid endorsement, this Tax Case (Appeal) is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
TC(A) No.497 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.12.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTHand
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
TC(A) No.497 of 2014
R.A.PalanisamyC/o Mr.S.Sridhar Advocate,112/1, Periyar Street,Erode 638 001(PAN: )
.. Appellant
vs
The Income Tax Officer,Ward I(2), Erode. .. Respondent
Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 03.03.2014 in ITA No.2057/Mds/2013 for the assessment year 2010-11.
For Appellant :Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan
For Respondent:
Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.AND
Mr.G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.
JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this
appeal as the appellant is stated to have filed an application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. He has made an endorsement to this effect.
2. Recording the aforesaid endorsement, this Tax Case (Appeal) is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Index:Yes/NoSpeaking OrderNeutral Citation:YesslTo
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 19.12.2024
The Income Tax Officer,Ward – I (2),Erode.
T.C.A.No.497 of 2014
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue