Case LawHigh Court › Rasheed Variyath Valappilaged 55 v. Meno...

Rasheed Variyath Valappilaged 55 v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaparvathy Menon

High Court 12 May 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rasheed Variyath Valappilaged 55 v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaparvathy Menon
Date of order
12 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rasheed Variyath Valappilaged 55 v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaparvathy Menon, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN FRIDAY, THE 12 DAY OF MAY 2023 / 22ND VAISAKHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 15606 OF 2023 PETITIONER: RASHEED VARIYATH VALAPPILAGED 55, S/O. KUNCHIPPA, VARIYATH VALAPPIL HOUSE, KOOTTANAD, THEKEVAVANUR P.O., CHALIPPURAM, PALAKKAD, PIN - 679533BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNAPARVATHY MENON RESPONDENTS: 1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICERNATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, PIN - 1100012NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTREDELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)., PIN - 110001 OTHER PRESENT: BY SMT.PARVATHY K. (G.P.) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON12.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T Dated this 12th day of May, 2023 Aggrieved by Ext P1 order of assessmentrelating to assessment year 2018-19, petitioner haspreferred an appeal before the 2[nd] respondent, acopy of which is produced as Ext P2. A petition forstay of proceedings pursuant to the assessment order has also been filed as Ext P3. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to be effected evenbefore the petition for stay is considered. Hencethis writ petition. 2.Having considered the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinion that this writpetition itself can be disposed of with a direction.3.Accordingly, there will be a direction tothe 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders onExt P3 stay petition, within a period of two monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.Tillsuchtime,allcoercive -:3:- proceedings against the petitioner shall be kept inabeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. TR Sd/-SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPENJUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15606/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit1 P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2018-19 DTD. 25-03-2023Exhibit P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTYD. 24-04-2023Exhibit P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.24-04-2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan