In Ratan J. Batliboi v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-16, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Notice of Motion as well as the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1992 OF 2013
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1688 OF 2013
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1992 OF 2013
Ratan J. Batliboi
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax-16
..Appellant
..Respondent
....
Mr. H.M. Inamdar, Advocate for Appellant.Mr. A.R. Malhotra a/w Mr. N.A. Kazi, Advocates for Respondent.
....
P.C.:
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.DATED : 2[nd] FEBRUARY 2015
1.Mr. Inamdar, learned Counsel appearing for appellant seeks to
withdraw the Notice of Motion as well as the Appeal.
2.Granted.
3.Notice of Motion as well as the Appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees as per rules.
S.S.DESHPANDE
[G.S. KULKARNI, J][M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue