Rath, Advocates v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court
24 Oct 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Rath, Advocates v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
24 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Rath, Advocates v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~50 to 58
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 15905/2022
+ W.P.(C) 15906/2022
+ W.P.(C) 7699/2024
+ W.P.(C) 1211/2024
+ W.P.(C) 8011/2024
+ W.P.(C) 6791/2024
+ W.P.(C) 7553/2024
+ W.P.(C) 7555/2024
+ W.P.(C) 7810/2024
MOL CORPORATION .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Nageswar Rao with Mr Pratik
Rath, Advocates.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar with Ms Monica Benjamin and Ms Easha Kadian, Advocates. Benjamin and Ms Easha Kadian, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAO R D E R% 11.12.2024
1.The learned counsel for the parties state that the orders have been
complied with and no further orders are required to be passed in these
petitions.
2.The petitions are, accordingly, closed.
VIBHU BAKHRU, ACJ
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
DECEMBER 11, 2024/tr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.