Case LawHigh Court › Rathinabala v. The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rathinabala v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals

High Court 24 Apr 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Rathinabala v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals
Date of order
24 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
2020-2021
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Rathinabala v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.04.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLEMR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Writ Petition No.12104 of 2025 Rathinabala ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), O/o.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Income Tax Department, Coimbatore. 2.The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi. 3.The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department, Ward 2(1), TPR No.121, No.121, Adams Building, Sixty Feet Road, Tiruppur - 641 602. … Respondents Page No.1 of 5 W.P.No.12104 of 2025 PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.03.2025 to stay the disputed demand for the Assessment Year 2020-2021 pending disposal of the Appeal. For Petitioner :Mr.Amardeep.R For Respondents : Dr.B.Ramaswamy, Senior Standing Counsel ORDER The present writ petition is filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.03.2025 to stay the disputed demand for the Assessment Year 2020-2021 pending disposal of the Appeal. 2. At the outset, Dr.B.Ramaswamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent would submit that the representation of the petitioner dated 14.03.2025 would be considered by the Respondent and orders passed within the time frame that may be stipulated by this Court. Page No.2 of 5 W.P.No.12104 of 20253. In view of the same, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited relief sought for in this Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to the Respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.03.2025, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the representation and it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the representation on its own merits and in accordance with law. 4. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 24.04.2025 jdIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking Order:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/NoPage No.3 of 5 Internet : Yes To: 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), O/o.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Income Tax Department, Coimbatore. 2.The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi. 3.The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department, Ward 2(1), TPR No.121, No.121, Adams Building, Sixty Feet Road, Tiruppur - 641 602. Page No.4 of 5 Page No.5 of 5 W.P.No.12104 of 2025KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. jd W.P.No.12104 of 2025 24.04.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan