Rathnachalam Chettiar Natarajan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
27 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Rathnachalam Chettiar Natarajan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rathnachalam Chettiar Natarajan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.The writ appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.03.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHANand
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN
W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022andC.M.P.(MD)No.8497 of 2022andC.M.P.(MD)No.2352 of 2025
Rathnachalam Chettiar Natarajan
... Appellant
Vs.
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Non-Corporate Circle-2,
Central Revenue Building,
No.2, V P Rathinasamy Nadar Road,
Viswanathapuram,
Maudrai - 625 002.
2.The Income Tax Officer,
National Faceless Assessment Centre,
Income Tax Department,
Ministry of Finance,
Room No.401, 2nd Floor,
E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium,
Delhi – 110 003.
3.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Revenue Building,
1/4
W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022
2, V P Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Viswanathapuram, Madurai - 625 002.... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause XV of Letters Patent, to allow the writ appeal by setting aside the order dated 27.06.2022 in W.P.(MD).No.13269 of 2022 on the file of this Court.
For Appellant: Mr.G.Baskar
For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar,
Standing Counsel.
JUDGMENT
Heard both sides.
2Aggrieved by the impugned assessment order, the appellant filed W.P.(MD)No.13269 of 2022. The writ petition was disposed of by observing that the assessee can pursue the alternative remedies.
3.The learned counsel for the appellant states that against the impugned order, the assessee can file either an appeal or revision. He has
chosen to file revision petition on 22.11.2024. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai is the revisional authority. Since 2/4
W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022
the assessee had filed writ petition and following the dismissal of the writ petition, this writ appeal came to be filed and during the pendency of the writ appeal, the revision petition was filed, the revisional authority is directed to condone the delay in filing the revision petition and give a disposal on merits and in accordance with. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter. The contentions of both the parties are left open.
4.The writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes/ Noias
(G.R.S. J.,) & (M.J.R. J.,) 27.03.2025
3/4
4/4
W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.andM.JOTHIRAMAN, J.ias
W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022
27.03.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.