Case LawHigh Court › Rathnachalam Chettiar Natarajan v. The A...

Rathnachalam Chettiar Natarajan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 27 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Rathnachalam Chettiar Natarajan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rathnachalam Chettiar Natarajan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.The writ appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHANand THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022andC.M.P.(MD)No.8497 of 2022andC.M.P.(MD)No.2352 of 2025 Rathnachalam Chettiar Natarajan ... Appellant Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Non-Corporate Circle-2, Central Revenue Building, No.2, V P Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Viswanathapuram, Maudrai - 625 002. 2.The Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance, Room No.401, 2nd Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi – 110 003. 3.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, 1/4 W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022 2, V P Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Viswanathapuram, Madurai - 625 002.... Respondents Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause XV of Letters Patent, to allow the writ appeal by setting aside the order dated 27.06.2022 in W.P.(MD).No.13269 of 2022 on the file of this Court. For Appellant: Mr.G.Baskar For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, Standing Counsel. JUDGMENT Heard both sides. 2Aggrieved by the impugned assessment order, the appellant filed W.P.(MD)No.13269 of 2022. The writ petition was disposed of by observing that the assessee can pursue the alternative remedies. 3.The learned counsel for the appellant states that against the impugned order, the assessee can file either an appeal or revision. He has chosen to file revision petition on 22.11.2024. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai is the revisional authority. Since 2/4 W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022 the assessee had filed writ petition and following the dismissal of the writ petition, this writ appeal came to be filed and during the pendency of the writ appeal, the revision petition was filed, the revisional authority is directed to condone the delay in filing the revision petition and give a disposal on merits and in accordance with. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter. The contentions of both the parties are left open. 4.The writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes/ Noias (G.R.S. J.,) & (M.J.R. J.,) 27.03.2025 3/4 4/4 W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.andM.JOTHIRAMAN, J.ias W.A.(MD)No.833 of 2022 27.03.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan