Ravi Sellappan v. Ravi Sellappan …Appellant Versus
High Court
07 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Ravi Sellappan v. Ravi Sellappan …Appellant Versus
Date of order
07 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ravi Sellappan v. Ravi Sellappan …Appellant Versus, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Hence, without going into the merits, the following order is passed by consent : a.The impugned order dated 25[th] October 2023 is hereby quashed and set aside.quashed and set aside. b.The matter is remanded to the Tribunal to re-hear Miscellaneous Application No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14804 OF 2023
Ravi Sellappan
…Petitioner
VersusThe Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-7, Pune & Anr.…Respondents
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 27376 OF 2023(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
Ravi Sellappan…AppellantVersus
The Union of India through the office of The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Pune …Respondent
Mr. Rahul Sarda a/w Mr. Sameer G. Dalal for Petitioner/Appellant.Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondents-Revenue.
PC:-
CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.DATED:7[th] May 2024
1.After the petition was heard for some time, the Court felt that
Petitioner had a prima-facie case. Hence, without going into the
merits, the following order is passed by consent :
a.The impugned order dated 25[th] October 2023 is hereby quashed and set aside.quashed and set aside.
b.The matter is remanded to the Tribunal to re-hear Miscellaneous Application No. 150/Pun/2023.
2.In view of the above, Income Tax Appeal (Lodging) No. 27376
of 2023 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh appeal
GITALAXMIKRISHNAKOTAWADEKAR
Digitally signed byGITALAXMI KRISHNAKOTAWADEKARDate: 2024.05.0911:04:18 +0545
3.We clarify that we have not made any observations on merits of
the matter.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.