Case LawHigh Court › Ravikumar v. The Principal Commissioner...

Ravikumar v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 27 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Ravikumar v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
2019-2020, 2019-20
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ravikumar v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Issue: Since the petitioner's representation was issued on 23.02.2023, it is unclear as to whether such representation is available on the records of the Income Tax Department.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.7972 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.03.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.No.7972 of 2024 Ravikumar ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, PCIT, Coimbatore. 2.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1, Salem. 3.The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Ward 1(6), Salem. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner IT return application dated 1/6 W.P.No.7972 of 2024 14.12.2022 for return of his TDS Amount for the Assessment Year 2019-2020 and considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.02.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Myilsamy For Respondents : Dr.B.Ramaswamy, Sr. SC ********** ORDER The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to consider the belated filing of the return of income for assessment year 2019-20 so as to enable the consideration of a claim for refund thereafter. The petitioner met with a road accident on 07.10.2012. He filed M.C.O.P.No.358 of 2013 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Special Sub Court No.2 at Salem claiming compensation in respect of such accident. The said petition was allowed partly by awarding the sum of Rs.71,31,000/- as compensation under Award dated 09.02.2015. He filed an appeal in C.M.A.No.1739 of 2016 on the file of this Court. By judgment dated 27.06.2018, the appeal filed by the 2/6 W.P.No.7972 of 2024 petitioner was allowed and the compensation was enhanced to Rs.73,25,806/-. While paying such compensation, the Insurance Company deducted TDS to the extent of Rs.5,69,000/-. In order to claim refund of the above mentioned TDS, the petitioner filed the return of income for assessment year 2019-20. Since such return of income was being filed beyond the specified time limit, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 23.02.2023 for condonation of delay. Since such representation was not disposed of, the present writ petition was filed. 2. Dr.B.Ramaswamy, learned senior standing counsel, accepts notice for the respondent. Upon considering the averments in the affidavit, in all fairness, he submits that the representation would be duly considered and disposed of. 3. Upon examining the averments in the affidavit and on scrutinizing documents filed in support of the writ petition, this 3/6 W.P.No.7972 of 2024 appears to be an appropriate case to consider an application under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for condonation. Since the petitioner's representation was issued on 23.02.2023, it is unclear as to whether such representation is available on the records of the Income Tax Department. 4. In these circumstances, W.P.No.7972 of 2024 is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to submit an application under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act before the jurisdictional authority / first respondent within a maximum period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon receipt thereof, the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the same by taking note of the observations set out in this order within one month from the date of receipt of such representation. No costs. rnaIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / No 27.03.2024 4/6 Neutral Citation: Yes / No To 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, PCIT, Coimbatore. PCIT, Coimbatore. 2.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1, Salem. Range-1, Salem. 3.The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Ward 1(6), Salem. Income Tax Ward 1(6), Salem. 5/6 6/6 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J rna W.P.No.7972 of 2024 27.03.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan