Ravinder Kumar Gupta v. Union Of India
High Court
01 Apr 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Ravinder Kumar Gupta v. Union Of India
Date of order
01 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ravinder Kumar Gupta v. Union Of India, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, the instant writ petition is dismissed on the ground ofavailability of statutory remedy against the impugned order.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4628/2022
Ravinder Kumar Gupta S/o Shyamlal Gupta, Aged About 49Years, R/o 6-O-17A, Jawahar Nagar, District Sri Ganganagar(Raj.) - 335001.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry OfFinance, Income Tax Department, National FacelessAssessment Center, Delhi.Finance, Income Tax Department, National FacelessAssessment Center, Delhi.
2. The ITO, Ward-1, Income Tax Department, Sriganganagar(Raj.)(Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Johari, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Shubhankar Johari & Mr. Tapendra Sankhlaassisted by Mr. Shubhankar Johari & Mr. Tapendra Sankhla
For Respondent(s):
-----
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
01/04/2022
Order
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioneragainst the assessment order dated 2.3.2022 passed by the ITOconcerned.
Admittedly, the remedy of appeal lies against the impugnedassessment order.
Hence, the instant writ petition is dismissed on the ground ofavailability of statutory remedy against the impugned order.
Needless to say that the petitioner will be at liberty to raiseall permissible legal and factual objections before the appellate
authority in the appeal if any filed against the impugnedassessment order.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
32-RP/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.