In Ravindra Champalal Khinvasara v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1 And Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4843 OF 2022
RAVINDRA CHAMPALAL KHINVASARAVERSUSTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1 AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Namit S. MuthiyanAdvocate for Respondents : Mrs. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, Mr. A. R. Kale
...
CORAM :R. D. DHANUKA & S. G. MEHARE, JJ.DATE :05-05-2022
PER COURT :-
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that assessmentnotice dated 23.04.2021 is issued by the respondent no. 1 underSection 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Hearing has beenproceeded further pursuant to the said notice and the matter isclosed for orders.
2.We are thus not inclined to interfere with the notice dated23.04.2021 at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed. No orderas to costs.
( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE
( R. D. DHANUKA ) JUDGE
rrd
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue