In Ravindra Jaisingrao Chavan v. Per Court, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.In view of the above this petition is disposed of aswithdrawn on instructions with liberty as is prayed for. [ Y.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 wp 6698.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6698 OF 2023
Ravindra Jaisingrao Chavan.. Petitioner
Versus
Office of the Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax and others.. Respondents
Shri Dattatraya K. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner.Shri Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM :RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ANDY. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE :21ST JUNE, 2023.
PER COURT :
1.The learned advocate for the Petitioner submits oninstructions that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this petitionand prefer a fresh petition. Subsequent events and additionalgrounds would be put forth in the newly filed petition.
2.In view of the above this petition is disposed of aswithdrawn on instructions with liberty as is prayed for.
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.]
[ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.]
bsb/June 23
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue