Case LawHigh Court › Ravindra Shantilal Peety v. A. Bagadiya

Ravindra Shantilal Peety v. A. Bagadiya

High Court 26 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Ravindra Shantilal Peety v. A. Bagadiya
Date of order
26 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ravindra Shantilal Peety v. A. Bagadiya, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD 924 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.23 OF 2013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AURANGABADVERSUSSURENDRA SHANTILAL PEETY AND 925 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.57 OF 2013 WITH ITA/59/2013 WITH ITA/58/2013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AURANGABADVERSUS RAVINDRA SHANTILAL PEETY ... Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sharma Alok M.Adv. for Respondent : Mr. R. N. Chavan h/f Mr. V. A. Bagadiya. … CORAM : R. D. DHANUKA, AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ. DATE : 26.04.2022 PER COURT:- 1.By these appeals filed under Section 260Aof the IncomeTax Act, 1961, the appellants-revenue have impugned theorders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 2.The learned counsel for the appellants-revenue does not dispute that the issue involved in these appealsare coveredby 2 924-ITA.23-2013+1.odtthe judgment delivered by this Court in Income Tax AppealNo.19 of 2013. The learned counsel appearing for both theparties state that this Court is not required to record anyreasons. Statement is accepted. 3.By the judgment delivered by this Court on 22.04.2022,in identical matters, this Court has dismissed the appeals filedby the appellants-revenue on the ground that the tax effectinvolved in those bunch of appeals being less than themonetary limit as prescribed in the earlier circulars dismissedthe appeals and did not answer the substantial questions of lawformulated by this Court while admitting these appeals. 4.For the reasons recorded by this Court in the judgmentdelivered in Income Tax Appeal No.19 of 2013 in case of theCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Surendra Shantilal Peety andother connected matters, both these appeals are dismissed inview of the tax effect involved in these appeals being less thanthe monetary limit as prescribed in the earlier circulars issuedfrom time to time. Thus, this Court is not required to answerany substantial questions of law formulated by this Court whileadmitting these appeals by this Court. There shall be no order 3 924-ITA.23-2013+1.odt as to costs. (S. G. MEHARE, J.) (R. D. DHANUKA, J.) … vmk/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan